#
#
-# Copyright (C) 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Google Inc.
+# Copyright (C) 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Google Inc.
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
_DEFAULT_PRIORITY = 0
+#: Minimum timeout required to consider scheduling a pending acquisition
+#: (seconds)
+_LOCK_ACQUIRE_MIN_TIMEOUT = (1.0 / 1000)
+
+# Internal lock acquisition modes for L{LockSet}
+(_LS_ACQUIRE_EXACT,
+ _LS_ACQUIRE_ALL,
+ _LS_ACQUIRE_OPPORTUNISTIC) = range(1, 4)
+
+_LS_ACQUIRE_MODES = compat.UniqueFrozenset([
+ _LS_ACQUIRE_EXACT,
+ _LS_ACQUIRE_ALL,
+ _LS_ACQUIRE_OPPORTUNISTIC,
+ ])
+
def ssynchronized(mylock, shared=0):
"""Shared Synchronization decorator.
self.__do_acquire(shared)
return True
+ # The lock couldn't be acquired right away, so if a timeout is given and is
+ # considered too short, return right away as scheduling a pending
+ # acquisition is quite expensive
+ if timeout is not None and timeout < _LOCK_ACQUIRE_MIN_TIMEOUT:
+ return False
+
prioqueue = self.__pending_by_prio.get(priority, None)
if shared:
ALL_SET = None
+def _TimeoutZero():
+ """Returns the number zero.
+
+ """
+ return 0
+
+
+def _GetLsAcquireModeAndTimeouts(want_all, timeout, opportunistic):
+ """Determines modes and timeouts for L{LockSet.acquire}.
+
+ @type want_all: boolean
+ @param want_all: Whether all locks in set should be acquired
+ @param timeout: Timeout in seconds or C{None}
+ @param opportunistic: Whther locks should be acquired opportunistically
+ @rtype: tuple
+ @return: Tuple containing mode to be passed to L{LockSet.__acquire_inner}
+ (one of L{_LS_ACQUIRE_MODES}), a function to calculate timeout for
+ acquiring the lockset-internal lock (might be C{None}) and a function to
+ calculate the timeout for acquiring individual locks
+
+ """
+ # Short circuit when no running timeout is needed
+ if opportunistic and not want_all:
+ assert timeout is None, "Got timeout for an opportunistic acquisition"
+ return (_LS_ACQUIRE_OPPORTUNISTIC, None, _TimeoutZero)
+
+ # We need to keep track of how long we spent waiting for a lock. The
+ # timeout passed to this function is over all lock acquisitions.
+ running_timeout = utils.RunningTimeout(timeout, False)
+
+ if want_all:
+ mode = _LS_ACQUIRE_ALL
+ ls_timeout_fn = running_timeout.Remaining
+ else:
+ mode = _LS_ACQUIRE_EXACT
+ ls_timeout_fn = None
+
+ if opportunistic:
+ mode = _LS_ACQUIRE_OPPORTUNISTIC
+ timeout_fn = _TimeoutZero
+ else:
+ timeout_fn = running_timeout.Remaining
+
+ return (mode, ls_timeout_fn, timeout_fn)
+
+
class _AcquireTimeout(Exception):
"""Internal exception to abort an acquire on a timeout.
else:
return False
+ def owning_all(self):
+ """Checks whether current thread owns internal lock.
+
+ Holding the internal lock is equivalent with holding all locks in the set
+ (the opposite does not necessarily hold as it can not be easily
+ determined). L{add} and L{remove} require the internal lock.
+
+ @rtype: boolean
+
+ """
+ return self.__lock.is_owned()
+
def _add_owned(self, name=None):
"""Note the current thread owns the given lock"""
if name is None:
self.__owners[threading.currentThread()].remove(name)
# Only remove the key if we don't hold the set-lock as well
- if (not self.__lock.is_owned() and
- not self.__owners[threading.currentThread()]):
+ if not (self.__lock.is_owned() or
+ self.__owners[threading.currentThread()]):
del self.__owners[threading.currentThread()]
def list_owned(self):
return set(result)
def acquire(self, names, timeout=None, shared=0, priority=None,
- test_notify=None):
+ opportunistic=False, test_notify=None):
"""Acquire a set of resource locks.
+ @note: When acquiring locks opportunistically, any number of locks might
+ actually be acquired, even zero.
+
@type names: list of strings (or string)
@param names: the names of the locks which shall be acquired
(special lock names, or instance/node names)
@param shared: whether to acquire in shared mode; by default an
exclusive lock will be acquired
@type timeout: float or None
- @param timeout: Maximum time to acquire all locks
+ @param timeout: Maximum time to acquire all locks; for opportunistic
+ acquisitions, a timeout can only be given when C{names} is C{None}, in
+ which case it is exclusively used for acquiring the L{LockSet}-internal
+ lock; opportunistic acquisitions don't use a timeout for acquiring
+ individual locks
@type priority: integer
@param priority: Priority for acquiring locks
+ @type opportunistic: boolean
+ @param opportunistic: Acquire locks opportunistically; use the return value
+ to determine which locks were actually acquired
@type test_notify: callable or None
@param test_notify: Special callback function for unittesting
if priority is None:
priority = _DEFAULT_PRIORITY
- # We need to keep track of how long we spent waiting for a lock. The
- # timeout passed to this function is over all lock acquires.
- running_timeout = utils.RunningTimeout(timeout, False)
-
try:
if names is not None:
+ assert timeout is None or not opportunistic, \
+ ("Opportunistic acquisitions can only use a timeout if no"
+ " names are given; see docstring for details")
+
# Support passing in a single resource to acquire rather than many
if isinstance(names, basestring):
names = [names]
- return self.__acquire_inner(names, False, shared, priority,
- running_timeout.Remaining, test_notify)
+ (mode, _, timeout_fn) = \
+ _GetLsAcquireModeAndTimeouts(False, timeout, opportunistic)
+
+ return self.__acquire_inner(names, mode, shared, priority,
+ timeout_fn, test_notify)
else:
+ (mode, ls_timeout_fn, timeout_fn) = \
+ _GetLsAcquireModeAndTimeouts(True, timeout, opportunistic)
+
# If no names are given acquire the whole set by not letting new names
# being added before we release, and getting the current list of names.
# Some of them may then be deleted later, but we'll cope with this.
# anyway, though, so we'll get the list lock exclusively as well in
# order to be able to do add() on the set while owning it.
if not self.__lock.acquire(shared=shared, priority=priority,
- timeout=running_timeout.Remaining()):
+ timeout=ls_timeout_fn()):
raise _AcquireTimeout()
+
try:
# note we own the set-lock
self._add_owned()
- return self.__acquire_inner(self.__names(), True, shared, priority,
- running_timeout.Remaining, test_notify)
+ return self.__acquire_inner(self.__names(), mode, shared,
+ priority, timeout_fn, test_notify)
except:
# We shouldn't have problems adding the lock to the owners list, but
# if we did we'll try to release this lock and re-raise exception.
except _AcquireTimeout:
return None
- def __acquire_inner(self, names, want_all, shared, priority,
+ def __acquire_inner(self, names, mode, shared, priority,
timeout_fn, test_notify):
"""Inner logic for acquiring a number of locks.
+ Acquisition modes:
+
+ - C{_LS_ACQUIRE_ALL}: C{names} contains names of all locks in set, but
+ deleted locks can be ignored as the whole set is being acquired with
+ its internal lock held
+ - C{_LS_ACQUIRE_EXACT}: The names listed in C{names} must be acquired;
+ timeouts and deleted locks are fatal
+ - C{_LS_ACQUIRE_OPPORTUNISTIC}: C{names} lists names of locks (potentially
+ all within the set) which should be acquired opportunistically, that is
+ failures are ignored
+
@param names: Names of the locks to be acquired
- @param want_all: Whether all locks in the set should be acquired
+ @param mode: Lock acquisition mode (one of L{_LS_ACQUIRE_MODES})
@param shared: Whether to acquire in shared mode
- @param timeout_fn: Function returning remaining timeout
+ @param timeout_fn: Function returning remaining timeout (C{None} for
+ opportunistic acquisitions)
@param priority: Priority for acquiring locks
@param test_notify: Special callback function for unittesting
"""
+ assert mode in _LS_ACQUIRE_MODES
+
acquire_list = []
# First we look the locks up on __lockdict. We have no way of being sure
# they will still be there after, but this makes it a lot faster should
# just one of them be the already wrong. Using a sorted sequence to prevent
# deadlocks.
- for lname in sorted(utils.UniqueSequence(names)):
+ for lname in sorted(frozenset(names)):
try:
lock = self.__lockdict[lname] # raises KeyError if lock is not there
except KeyError:
- if want_all:
- # We are acquiring all the set, it doesn't matter if this particular
- # element is not there anymore.
- continue
-
- raise errors.LockError("Non-existing lock %s in set %s (it may have"
- " been removed)" % (lname, self.name))
-
- acquire_list.append((lname, lock))
+ # We are acquiring the whole set, it doesn't matter if this particular
+ # element is not there anymore. If, however, only certain names should
+ # be acquired, not finding a lock is an error.
+ if mode == _LS_ACQUIRE_EXACT:
+ raise errors.LockError("Lock '%s' not found in set '%s' (it may have"
+ " been removed)" % (lname, self.name))
+ else:
+ acquire_list.append((lname, lock))
# This will hold the locknames we effectively acquired.
acquired = set()
priority=priority,
test_notify=test_notify_fn)
except errors.LockError:
- if want_all:
- # We are acquiring all the set, it doesn't matter if this
+ if mode in (_LS_ACQUIRE_ALL, _LS_ACQUIRE_OPPORTUNISTIC):
+ # We are acquiring the whole set, it doesn't matter if this
# particular element is not there anymore.
continue
- raise errors.LockError("Non-existing lock %s in set %s (it may"
- " have been removed)" % (lname, self.name))
+ raise errors.LockError("Lock '%s' not found in set '%s' (it may have"
+ " been removed)" % (lname, self.name))
if not acq_success:
# Couldn't get lock or timeout occurred
+ if mode == _LS_ACQUIRE_OPPORTUNISTIC:
+ # Ignore timeouts on opportunistic acquisitions
+ continue
+
if timeout is None:
# This shouldn't happen as SharedLock.acquire(timeout=None) is
# blocking.
return removed
-# Locking levels, must be acquired in increasing order.
-# Current rules are:
-# - at level LEVEL_CLUSTER resides the Big Ganeti Lock (BGL) which must be
-# acquired before performing any operation, either in shared or in exclusive
-# mode. acquiring the BGL in exclusive mode is discouraged and should be
-# avoided.
-# - at levels LEVEL_NODE and LEVEL_INSTANCE reside node and instance locks.
-# If you need more than one node, or more than one instance, acquire them at
-# the same time.
-LEVEL_CLUSTER = 0
-LEVEL_INSTANCE = 1
-LEVEL_NODEGROUP = 2
-LEVEL_NODE = 3
-LEVEL_NODE_RES = 4
+# Locking levels, must be acquired in increasing order. Current rules are:
+# - At level LEVEL_CLUSTER resides the Big Ganeti Lock (BGL) which must be
+# acquired before performing any operation, either in shared or exclusive
+# mode. Acquiring the BGL in exclusive mode is discouraged and should be
+# avoided..
+# - At levels LEVEL_NODE and LEVEL_INSTANCE reside node and instance locks. If
+# you need more than one node, or more than one instance, acquire them at the
+# same time.
+# - LEVEL_NODE_RES is for node resources and should be used by operations with
+# possibly high impact on the node's disks.
+# - LEVEL_NODE_ALLOC blocks instance allocations for the whole cluster
+# ("NAL" is the only lock at this level). It should be acquired in shared
+# mode when an opcode blocks all or a significant amount of a cluster's
+# locks. Opcodes doing instance allocations should acquire in exclusive mode.
+# Once the set of acquired locks for an opcode has been reduced to the working
+# set, the NAL should be released as well to allow allocations to proceed.
+(LEVEL_CLUSTER,
+ LEVEL_INSTANCE,
+ LEVEL_NODE_ALLOC,
+ LEVEL_NODEGROUP,
+ LEVEL_NODE,
+ LEVEL_NODE_RES,
+ LEVEL_NETWORK) = range(0, 7)
LEVELS = [
LEVEL_CLUSTER,
LEVEL_INSTANCE,
+ LEVEL_NODE_ALLOC,
LEVEL_NODEGROUP,
LEVEL_NODE,
LEVEL_NODE_RES,
+ LEVEL_NETWORK,
]
# Lock levels which are modifiable
-LEVELS_MOD = frozenset([
+LEVELS_MOD = compat.UniqueFrozenset([
LEVEL_NODE_RES,
LEVEL_NODE,
LEVEL_NODEGROUP,
LEVEL_INSTANCE,
+ LEVEL_NETWORK,
])
#: Lock level names (make sure to use singular form)
LEVEL_NAMES = {
LEVEL_CLUSTER: "cluster",
LEVEL_INSTANCE: "instance",
+ LEVEL_NODE_ALLOC: "node-alloc",
LEVEL_NODEGROUP: "nodegroup",
LEVEL_NODE: "node",
LEVEL_NODE_RES: "node-res",
+ LEVEL_NETWORK: "network",
}
# Constant for the big ganeti lock
BGL = "BGL"
+#: Node allocation lock
+NAL = "NAL"
-class GanetiLockManager:
+
+class GanetiLockManager(object):
"""The Ganeti Locking Library
The purpose of this small library is to manage locking for ganeti clusters
"""
_instance = None
- def __init__(self, nodes, nodegroups, instances):
+ def __init__(self, node_uuids, nodegroups, instance_names, networks):
"""Constructs a new GanetiLockManager object.
There should be only a GanetiLockManager object at any time, so this
function raises an error if this is not the case.
- @param nodes: list of node names
+ @param node_uuids: list of node UUIDs
@param nodegroups: list of nodegroup uuids
- @param instances: list of instance names
+ @param instance_names: list of instance names
"""
assert self.__class__._instance is None, \
# locking order.
self.__keyring = {
LEVEL_CLUSTER: LockSet([BGL], "cluster", monitor=self._monitor),
- LEVEL_NODE: LockSet(nodes, "node", monitor=self._monitor),
- LEVEL_NODE_RES: LockSet(nodes, "node-res", monitor=self._monitor),
+ LEVEL_NODE: LockSet(node_uuids, "node", monitor=self._monitor),
+ LEVEL_NODE_RES: LockSet(node_uuids, "node-res", monitor=self._monitor),
LEVEL_NODEGROUP: LockSet(nodegroups, "nodegroup", monitor=self._monitor),
- LEVEL_INSTANCE: LockSet(instances, "instance",
+ LEVEL_INSTANCE: LockSet(instance_names, "instance",
monitor=self._monitor),
+ LEVEL_NETWORK: LockSet(networks, "network", monitor=self._monitor),
+ LEVEL_NODE_ALLOC: LockSet([NAL], "node-alloc", monitor=self._monitor),
}
assert compat.all(ls.name == LEVEL_NAMES[level]
- for (level, ls) in self.__keyring.items())
+ for (level, ls) in self.__keyring.items()), \
+ "Keyring name mismatch"
def AddToLockMonitor(self, provider):
"""Registers a new lock with the monitor.
"""
return self.__keyring[level].check_owned(names, shared=shared)
+ def owning_all(self, level):
+ """Checks whether current thread owns all locks at a certain level.
+
+ @see: L{LockSet.owning_all}
+
+ """
+ return self.__keyring[level].owning_all()
+
def _upper_owned(self, level):
"""Check that we don't own any lock at a level greater than the given one.
"""
return level == LEVEL_CLUSTER and (names is None or BGL in names)
- def acquire(self, level, names, timeout=None, shared=0, priority=None):
+ def acquire(self, level, names, timeout=None, shared=0, priority=None,
+ opportunistic=False):
"""Acquire a set of resource locks, at the same level.
@type level: member of locking.LEVELS
@param timeout: Maximum time to acquire all locks
@type priority: integer
@param priority: Priority for acquiring lock
+ @type opportunistic: boolean
+ @param opportunistic: Acquire locks opportunistically; use the return value
+ to determine which locks were actually acquired
"""
assert level in LEVELS, "Invalid locking level %s" % level
# point in acquiring any other lock, unless perhaps we are half way through
# the migration of the current opcode.
assert (self._contains_BGL(level, names) or self._BGL_owned()), (
- "You must own the Big Ganeti Lock before acquiring any other")
+ "You must own the Big Ganeti Lock before acquiring any other")
# Check we don't own locks at the same or upper levels.
assert not self._upper_owned(level), ("Cannot acquire locks at a level"
- " while owning some at a greater one")
+ " while owning some at a greater one")
# Acquire the locks in the set.
return self.__keyring[level].acquire(names, shared=shared, timeout=timeout,
- priority=priority)
+ priority=priority,
+ opportunistic=opportunistic)
def downgrade(self, level, names=None):
"""Downgrade a set of resource locks from exclusive to shared mode.
assert level in LEVELS, "Invalid locking level %s" % level
assert (not self._contains_BGL(level, names) or
not self._upper_owned(LEVEL_CLUSTER)), (
- "Cannot release the Big Ganeti Lock while holding something"
- " at upper levels (%r)" %
- (utils.CommaJoin(["%s=%r" % (LEVEL_NAMES[i], self.list_owned(i))
- for i in self.__keyring.keys()]), ))
+ "Cannot release the Big Ganeti Lock while holding something"
+ " at upper levels (%r)" %
+ (utils.CommaJoin(["%s=%r" % (LEVEL_NAMES[i], self.list_owned(i))
+ for i in self.__keyring.keys()]), ))
# Release will complain if we don't own the locks already
return self.__keyring[level].release(names)
"""
assert level in LEVELS_MOD, "Invalid or immutable level %s" % level
assert self._BGL_owned(), ("You must own the BGL before performing other"
- " operations")
+ " operations")
assert not self._upper_owned(level), ("Cannot add locks at a level"
- " while owning some at a greater one")
+ " while owning some at a greater one")
return self.__keyring[level].add(names, acquired=acquired, shared=shared)
def remove(self, level, names):
"""
assert level in LEVELS_MOD, "Invalid or immutable level %s" % level
assert self._BGL_owned(), ("You must own the BGL before performing other"
- " operations")
+ " operations")
# Check we either own the level or don't own anything from here
# up. LockSet.remove() will check the case in which we don't own
# all the needed resources, or we have a shared ownership.