Revision 41eb900e
ID | 41eb900ea2429e083685c590fb274af6c35fbb16 |
Parent | 37519c09 |
Child | 942a9a6a |
Improve message for (==?) operator
After seeing how nice HUnit formats the error message on failed
'assertEqual', I think we can do better with ==?. Currently it says
(on one line): "Expected equality, but 1 /= 2".
This patch changes the code to format it similar to HUnit:
Expected equality, but got mismatch
expected: 1
but got: 2
(on three lines). This makes it more clear what is the expected and
what is the wrong value.
A few tests have been modified to ensure that the expected value is
the second argument to ==?. This is different than HUnit, but makes
more sense in the operator version (I think).
Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop <iustin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Helga Velroyen <helgav@google.com>
Files
- added
- modified
- copied
- renamed
- deleted